tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post6380804864182163578..comments2023-12-21T06:35:36.624-05:00Comments on Recursivity: New Crank Proof of P = NPUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-69959376815121553962012-05-04T08:03:03.130-04:002012-05-04T08:03:03.130-04:00The fact that the author did not seem to cite any ...The fact that the author did not seem to cite any of his listed references in the text is a particularly nice touch.<br /><br />By the way, better be careful, the guy could be dangerous. He claims to have painted a fake Picasso over a real Picasso (http://www.jmarkinman.com/?p=151).Joel Reyes Nochehttp://joelnoche.multiply.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-22218687168586323272012-05-03T07:29:26.187-04:002012-05-03T07:29:26.187-04:00Harriet: that is a common feature of Cantor Cranke...Harriet: that is a common feature of Cantor Crankery posted at Mark CC's blog.Valhar2000https://www.blogger.com/profile/05467019327257867276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-68130287769180902482012-05-02T20:00:26.476-04:002012-05-02T20:00:26.476-04:00But wait, it's written with TeX. How can it po...But wait, it's written with TeX. How can it possibly be wrong?!<br /><br />~~ PaulPaul C. Anagnostopoulosnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-73103804038848629632012-04-30T15:25:32.708-04:002012-04-30T15:25:32.708-04:00It's great how he uses \sum instead of \Sigma....It's great how he uses \sum instead of \Sigma. . .Jeffohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06989946392105339862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-62039136706724184892012-04-28T23:03:08.310-04:002012-04-28T23:03:08.310-04:00It looks as if this author made the mistake of con...It looks as if this author made the mistake of confusing the set of real numbers with the set of real numbers which have either a finite or a repeating decimal expansion.Harriethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17953435368705942387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-30891153059452440332012-04-28T16:59:35.167-04:002012-04-28T16:59:35.167-04:00Takis:
It is a rare talent of mine.Takis:<br /><br />It is a rare talent of mine.Jeffrey Shallithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12763971505497961430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-91492394577728145892012-04-28T12:49:15.790-04:002012-04-28T12:49:15.790-04:00How much of this paper actually makes sense to you...How much of this paper actually makes sense to you? I understand nothing except that a contradiction to a well established proof in 2 pages is probably incorrect. Maybe that's the point...Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13583172125730736752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-1258947226763520522012-04-28T11:36:38.246-04:002012-04-28T11:36:38.246-04:00I feel so stupid. I can't even parse the very ...I feel so stupid. I can't even parse the very first formula. What does the existential quantifier do inside a summation?<br /><br />How did you come across such a gem?Takis Konstantopouloshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14675216467783238403noreply@blogger.com