tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post113536061061201902..comments2023-12-21T06:35:36.624-05:00Comments on Recursivity: Elmasry Wrong AgainUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-1157119759706422702006-09-01T10:09:00.000-04:002006-09-01T10:09:00.000-04:00You seem to have a reading comprehension problem. ...You seem to have a reading comprehension problem. The <I>Charter</I> protects freedom of thought, opinion, and expression, and as such, protects "indecent" expression. Whether the court referenced the Charter in their decision is irrelevant.Jeffrey Shallithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12763971505497961430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20067416.post-1157080988795595682006-08-31T23:23:00.000-04:002006-08-31T23:23:00.000-04:00Your comments about the Charter are irrelevant. T...Your comments about the Charter are irrelevant. The arguments before the Court were about the definition of indecency. The Charter did not enter in to the decision.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com