At least according to Doug Groothuis.
No need to even glance at all those lists of biblical contradictions, Doug. You've proved it with logic!
Monday, August 20, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recurrent thoughts about mathematics, science, politics, music, religion, and
Recurrent thoughts about mathematics, science, politics, music, religion, and
Recurrent thoughts about mathematics, science, politics, music, religion, and
Recurrent thoughts about ....
6 comments:
"2.There are cogent arguments from nature and humanity that an personal-infinite God exists.
3.If (2), then this God could inspire writings to say what he wants them to say..."
Right there is the problem with this kind of sophistry. (2) is asserted and assumed to be true from (3) onward. But those "cogent arguments" are never given, or even referenced.
This site is plain ol' fun:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_errata
I tried posting a comment but I'm guessing he's not going to publish it—I included a link to the reason project's poster of bible contradictions.
Then I asked him how we should reconcile the claim of an inerrant and good god with the wicked acts commanded by god in the old testament.
Doug doesn't publish any comments except those that praise him and his cult of unreason.
Cody, great link, thanks. In fact, the graph in the link looks ( superficially) like a type of random graphs I'm studying in my research. Now I have to look at it more closely.
Funny how he regards himself as a leader in Christian apologetics and yet this piece is almost childish.
In further hypocrisy he has fallen in love with Mitt who worships a completely false religion.
Chris P
Post a Comment